Gjykata Themelore n\u00eb Prishtin\u00eb, edhe n\u00eb rigjykim e ka refuzuar si t\u00eb pabaz\u00eb padin\u00eb e padit\u00ebsit Naser Rafuna, me t\u00eb cil\u00ebn kishte k\u00ebrkuar q\u00eb t\u00eb anulohet si i kund\u00ebrligjsh\u00ebm vendimi i Senatit t\u00eb Universitetit t\u00eb Prishtin\u00ebs \u201cHasan Prishtina\u201d dhe t\u00eb detyrohet q\u00eb ta sistemoj\u00eb n\u00eb vendin e pun\u00ebs si m\u00ebsimdh\u00ebn\u00ebs n\u00eb Fakultetin e Arteve p\u00ebr l\u00ebnd\u00ebn Diksion.<\/p>\n
Sipas aktgjykimit t\u00eb marr\u00eb m\u00eb 25 maj 2023, Gjykata ka vler\u00ebsuar se padit\u00ebsi ka d\u00ebshtuar q\u00eb t\u00eb v\u00ebrtetoj\u00eb shkeljet ligjore gjat\u00eb marrjes s\u00eb vendimit t\u00eb t\u00eb paditur\u00ebs m\u00eb 29 dhjetor 2014 n\u00eb baz\u00eb t\u00eb s\u00eb cilit Senati i UP-s\u00eb kishte vendosur q\u00eb t\u00eb mos e avancoj\u00eb\/zgjedh si m\u00ebsimdh\u00ebn\u00ebs asnj\u00ebrin nga kandidat\u00ebt dhe q\u00eb t\u00eb rishpallet konkursi p\u00ebr l\u00ebnd\u00ebn Diksion sipas procedurave t\u00eb rregullta ligjore, raporton \u201cBetimi p\u00ebr Drejt\u00ebsi\u201d.<\/p>\n
N\u00eb aktgjykim, thuhet se sipas nenit 80 t\u00eb Ligjit t\u00eb Pun\u00ebs, Gjykata vet\u00ebm n\u00eb rastet kur konstaton se nd\u00ebrprerja e kontrat\u00ebs s\u00eb pun\u00ebs nga ana e pun\u00ebdh\u00ebn\u00ebsit \u00ebsht\u00eb joligjore, at\u00ebher\u00eb mund t\u00eb detyroj\u00eb t\u00eb paditur\u00ebn q\u00eb ta rikthej\u00eb t\u00eb pun\u00ebsuarin n\u00eb vendin e tij t\u00eb pun\u00ebs dhe t\u00eb urdh\u00ebroj\u00eb kompensimin e t\u00eb gjitha pagave dhe p\u00ebrfitimeve tjera t\u00eb humbura gjat\u00eb koh\u00ebs s\u00eb largimit t\u00eb paligjsh\u00ebm nga puna.<\/p>\n
\u201c\u2026N\u00eb rastin konkret nuk kemi t\u00eb b\u00ebjm\u00eb me nd\u00ebrprerje t\u00eb marr\u00ebdh\u00ebnies s\u00eb pun\u00ebs andaj gjykata nuk mund ta detyroj\u00eb t\u00eb paditur\u00ebn q\u00eb t\u00eb themeloj\u00eb marr\u00ebdh\u00ebnie pune me padit\u00ebsin me t\u00eb gjitha t\u00eb drejtat nga marr\u00ebdh\u00ebnia e pun\u00ebs dhe t\u2019i jap thirrjen Profesor\/Asistent..\u201d, thuhet n\u00eb vendimin e gjykat\u00ebs.<\/p>\n
Sipas vler\u00ebsimit t\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebs, k\u00ebrkesa e padit\u00ebsit Rafuna q\u00eb gjykata t\u00eb detyroj\u00eb t\u00eb paditur\u00ebn q\u00eb ta sistemoj\u00eb t\u00eb nj\u00ebjtin n\u00eb vendin e pun\u00ebs si m\u00ebsimdh\u00ebn\u00ebs p\u00ebr l\u00ebnd\u00ebn Diksion \u00ebsht\u00eb n\u00eb kund\u00ebrshtim me nenin 173 t\u00eb Senatit t\u00eb UP-s\u00eb, pasi q\u00eb gjykata nuk mund t\u00eb obligoj\u00eb t\u00eb paditur\u00ebn q\u00eb padit\u00ebsin ta em\u00ebroj\u00eb si Profesor\/Asistent, sepse nj\u00eb kompetenc\u00eb t\u00eb till\u00eb e kan\u00eb vet\u00ebm bart\u00ebsit arsimit t\u00eb lart\u00eb.<\/p>\n
N\u00eb vendim thuhet se pasi q\u00eb Gjykata b\u00ebri vler\u00ebsimin e secil\u00ebs prov\u00eb ve\u00e7 e ve\u00e7, erdhi n\u00eb p\u00ebrfundim se n\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb \u00e7\u00ebshtje juridike-kontestimore duhet vendosur si n\u00eb dispozitiv t\u00eb k\u00ebtij aktgjykimi.<\/p>\n
N\u00eb aktgjykim, thuhet se lidhur me vendimin kontestues, Gjykata gjeti se i nj\u00ebjti \u00ebsht\u00eb marr\u00eb n\u00eb p\u00ebrputhje me dispozit\u00ebn e nenit 173 t\u00eb Statutit t\u00eb UP-s\u00eb.<\/p>\n
Gjykata ka vler\u00ebsuar se vendimet e Senatit nuk kan\u00eb rol afirmativ, por kan\u00eb rol p\u00ebrfundimtar lidhur me em\u00ebrimin e personelit akademik si\u00e7 \u00ebsht\u00eb p\u00ebrcaktuar n\u00eb nenin 173 t\u00eb Statutit t\u00eb UP-s\u00eb, andaj bazuar n\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb gjykata ka vler\u00ebsuar se vendimi i Senatit, i dat\u00ebs 29 dhjetor 2014 \u00ebsht\u00eb i ligjsh\u00ebm.<\/p>\n
Ndryshe, padit\u00ebsi Naser Rafuna p\u00ebrmes padis\u00eb s\u00eb 7 marsit 2015, ka k\u00ebrkuar nga Universiteti i Prishtin\u00ebs \u201cHasan Prishtina\u201d, Fakulteti i Arteve. q\u00eb t\u00eb anulohet vendimi i Senatit p\u00ebr moszgjedhjen e tij n\u00eb pozit\u00ebn Profesor\/Asistent n\u00eb l\u00ebnd\u00ebn Diksion.<\/p>\n
N\u00eb padi thuhet se padit\u00ebsi Rafuna, ka aplikuar p\u00ebr k\u00ebt\u00eb pozit\u00eb n\u00eb thirrjen e m\u00ebsimdh\u00ebn\u00ebsit n\u00eb Fakultetin e Arteve p\u00ebr l\u00ebnd\u00ebn Diksion. Komisioni recensues, pas shqyrtimit dhe vler\u00ebsimit t\u00eb detajuar t\u00eb dokumentacionit ka konstatuar se padit\u00ebsi i plot\u00ebson kushtet e parapara me konkurs p\u00ebr zgjedhje n\u00eb thirrjen e m\u00ebsimdh\u00ebn\u00ebsit, duke vler\u00ebsuar edhe arritjet n\u00eb pun\u00eb artistike, mir\u00ebpo vler\u00ebsimi pozitiv me p\u00ebrpar\u00ebsi t\u00eb caktuar jepet p\u00ebr kandidatin tjet\u00ebr edhe pse nuk plot\u00ebsonte kushtet e k\u00ebrkuara me konkurs.<\/p>\n
Tutje, n\u00eb padi thuhet se K\u00ebshilli i Fakultetit t\u00eb Arteve n\u00eb mbledhjen e mbajtur nuk aprovon vler\u00ebsimin e Komisionit Recensues dhe i propozon Senatit t\u00eb UP-s\u00eb q\u00eb padit\u00ebsi t\u00eb zgjidhet m\u00ebsimdh\u00ebn\u00ebs n\u00eb l\u00ebnd\u00ebn Diksion.<\/p>\n
Mir\u00ebpo, Senati i UP-s\u00eb me vendimin e dat\u00ebs 29 dhjetor 2014, ka vendosur q\u00eb t\u00eb mos e avancoj\u00eb p\u00ebr m\u00ebsimdh\u00ebn\u00ebs asnj\u00ebrin nga kandidat\u00ebt q\u00eb kishin konkurruar duke p\u00ebrfshir\u00eb edhe padit\u00ebsin p\u00ebr shkak se ka mosp\u00ebrputhshm\u00ebri nd\u00ebrmjet vler\u00ebsimit t\u00eb Komisionit Recensues dhe vendimit t\u00eb K\u00ebshillit t\u00eb Fakultetit t\u00eb Arteve.<\/p>\n
Ndaj k\u00ebtij vendimi, padit\u00ebsi Rafuna n\u00eb afat t\u00eb caktuar ka ushtruar ankes\u00eb, mir\u00ebpo pasi q\u00eb e paditura nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb p\u00ebrgjigjur ndaj ankes\u00ebs, i nj\u00ebjti ka ushtruar k\u00ebt\u00eb padi.<\/p>\n
N\u00eb padi tutje, thuhet se m\u00eb 13 janar 2015 Senati i Universitetit t\u00eb Prishtin\u00ebs ka nxjerr\u00eb vendim s\u00ebrish p\u00ebr publikimin e konkursit p\u00ebr plot\u00ebsimin e vendit t\u00eb nj\u00ebjt\u00eb t\u00eb pun\u00ebs, m\u00ebsimdh\u00ebn\u00ebs n\u00eb Fakultetin e Arteve t\u00eb UP-s\u00eb p\u00ebr l\u00ebnd\u00ebn Diksion.<\/p>\n
Ndryshe, ky rast \u00ebsht\u00eb kthyer n\u00eb rigjykim nga Gjykata e Apelit, e cila ka pranuar ankes\u00ebn e padit\u00ebsit Naser Rafuna si t\u00eb bazuar dhe ka vendosur q\u00eb l\u00ebnd\u00ebn ta kthej\u00eb n\u00eb rivendosje n\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebn Themelore n\u00eb Prishtin\u00eb.<\/p>\n
Kjo pasi q\u00eb, Themeloja kishte refuzuar si t\u00eb pabazuar k\u00ebrkes\u00eb padin\u00eb e padit\u00ebsit, me t\u00eb cil\u00ebn i nj\u00ebjti ka k\u00ebrkuar q\u00eb t\u00eb sistemohet n\u00eb vendin e pun\u00ebs si m\u00ebsimdh\u00ebn\u00ebs n\u00eb Fakultetin e Arteve t\u00eb Universitetit t\u00eb Prishtin\u00ebs p\u00ebr l\u00ebnd\u00ebn Diksion.<\/p>\n
Kund\u00ebr k\u00ebtij aktgjykimi, padit\u00ebsi ka ushtruar ankes\u00eb p\u00ebr shkak t\u00eb shkeljeve esenciale t\u00eb dispozitave t\u00eb procedur\u00ebs kontestimore, duke k\u00ebrkuar q\u00eb t\u00eb ndryshohet i nj\u00ebjti apo l\u00ebnda t\u00eb kthehet n\u00eb gjykat\u00ebn e shkall\u00ebs s\u00eb par\u00eb p\u00ebr rishqyrtim dhe rivendosje.<\/p>\n
Gjykata e Apelit pas shqyrtimit t\u00eb shkresave t\u00eb l\u00ebnd\u00ebs dhe pretendimeve ankimore, kishte gjetur se ankesa e padit\u00ebsit \u00ebsht\u00eb e bazuar dhe se n\u00eb procedur\u00ebn e zhvilluar para shkall\u00ebs s\u00eb par\u00eb nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb b\u00ebr\u00eb vler\u00ebsimi i plot\u00eb dhe i drejt\u00eb i gjendjes faktike.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Gjykata Themelore n\u00eb Prishtin\u00eb, edhe n\u00eb rigjykim e ka refuzuar si t\u00eb pabaz\u00eb padin\u00eb e padit\u00ebsit Naser Rafuna, me t\u00eb cil\u00ebn kishte k\u00ebrkuar q\u00eb t\u00eb<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":14,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[49],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-10903","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-showbiz"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/indeks.bilten.mk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10903","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/indeks.bilten.mk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/indeks.bilten.mk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/indeks.bilten.mk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/14"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/indeks.bilten.mk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=10903"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/indeks.bilten.mk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10903\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/indeks.bilten.mk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=10903"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/indeks.bilten.mk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=10903"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/indeks.bilten.mk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=10903"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}